Monday, December 14, 2009

Street influences

Influences in fashion can come from many places. Recently I have written about a few like films and art. But fashions influence can also come from everyday people. It can come in the from of a work uniform that is somehow appealing to the the masses. It can be a design element that is functional that somehow transcends and causes hysteria of copy-cat wearers. An example could be those sexy little spandex shorts that grace the behinds of bike messengers that suddenly cross over into club wearing kids. Perhaps it’s the legions of business women sporting Nikes with their Donna Karan or Armani business suit while toting a huge Fendi bag. These trends are usually born out of a combination of necessity, envy, a light touch of the practicality and a heavy dose of design flair. But these trends are also a movement that point or reflect where society is going and how it is reflected most often by youth as they, unlike their parents, have more disposible income. Below are a short list of some pretty cool trends that have boiled up from the populace and how they still influence design today.
The Zoot Suit.
A ethnic mixture of Puerto Rican, African, Filipino and Italian style that could only be mixed in America during the late 1930 and 1940s. The look which featured a generously cut, widely padded shoulder jacket with equally generously cut (almost baggy) pants that tapered in a the cuff. It gained a strong hold in Harlem and became synonymous with jazz.
It even spawned a play of the same name. In the 80’s MC Hammer brought a re-interpretation of the Zoot Suit with his Hammer pants. They were extremely popular in the gym with the weight lifters. They were everywhere. I must confess, I still have a pair (in fact I wear them a lot as pjs - they are so comfortable.) John Galliano used the Zoot suit as inspiration for his 2002 Spring Collection

http://www.stageandscreenwriters.com/Paul_Glitter.html
http://www.chicano.ucla.edu/center/events/Sleepy_Lagoon/SleepyLagCol.htm
http://www.chicano.ucla.edu/center/events/Sleepy_Lagoon/SleepyLagCol.htm

Teddy Boys
After WW2, Savile Row in London tried to reintroduce Edwardian period clothing. (Edwardian... aka Teddy - get it?) The style features a long frock coat, sometimes with a velvet or contrasting lapel. It is worn with tight formfit trousers (or currently jeans) accompanied with a vest and perhaps a skinny tie (maybe even a bolo tie). The hair is usually a overdone and big, gelled with aa duck tail cut in the back.
The style was picked up by rockers and became a subculture. A side note: It seems pretty apparent that most trends in clothing seem to stem from the young. Each generation tries to put a stamp or mark on fashion with it’s own unique joie de vivre. One could call this look classically now. Junya Watanabe also reintroduced this look in Spring 2007 Jen Laugesen trotted the Teddy Boy look out in early 2008 as did the Topshop in 2009.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teddy_Boy
http://www.rockabilly.nl/general/teddyboys.htm
http://www.fashion-era.com/1950s/1950s_4_teenagers_teddy_boys.htm


Beatniks
Also in the 1950’s, but moving into the early 1960’s, the Beat or Beatnik generation was philosophically grounded and as partly a reaction to capitalism. The fashion movement was counter-cultural and lofty in idealism from many different and diverse viewpoints. It has a huge influence with the writings of Jack Kerouac and kind of a “F.U.” mentality.
One common thread however was dress… think a French beret, black turtlenecks, and very tight, skinny (usually cropped jeans). It was a symbol for years of intellectualism…. In fact, go on many college campuses today and you will see professors sporting the looks… at least the beret and the turtleneck. In 2006, Gap used original footage from the film Funny Face to introduce it’s reissuance of the skinny leg jean from that time period.
The film featured fashion icon Audrey Hepburn as a Beatnik.

http://www.backinskinnyjeans.com/2006/09/model_too_skinn.html
http://propagandica.wordpress.com/2008/12/15/knowles-hepburn/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gap_%28clothing_retailer%29
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/danny-miller/audrey-hepburn-dead-is-th_b_29484.html


Mods
Running at the same time as the beatniks was the Mods. Like the decades previous Teddy Boys, the Mods were a British inspired movement. This movement is a bit more difficult to nail down as it was defined as anything believed to be Modern, fashionable and popular. It was a reaction to the early 50’s James Dean look of the greaser /rural town rocker. This was also a style that was more androgynous with women wearing men’s trousers and little makeup and men wearing black eyeliner.
This was also a subculture that had a noticeable use of amphetamines as a recreational drug. Twiggy was the visual spokerperson for this movement as was Mary Quant with her micro mini skirts. Giles in Spring 2006 and Francisco Costa for Calvin Klein in Spring 2009 took a huge stab at creating very modern clothing for today’s crowd. Both were very successful in something that is very difficult… modern can be hard without looking kitchy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mod_%28subculture%29
http://www.fiftiesweb.com/fashion/mod-fashion.htm
http://www.retrowow.co.uk/retro_style/60s/60s_mods.html


Hippies
Drugs, sex and rock and roll. The sixties hippies was a falling out of society in that fashion was anti-fashion. Jeans and t-shirts was the norm. Crochet and patchwork, the look of poverty mixed with the music of Janis Joplin and a few mild altering drugs, this subculture also brought us psychedelic clothing and the tie dyed t-shirt.
This generation, like our current one, was reacting to war and the ugliness of the world. The previous generations has a lot of economic problems as the result of war. This generation did not like the war from many grounds and thus checked out.
Sidenote #2 Not that I am a prude by any standard, but I do find it odd (and perhaps a little sad), each generation has found a new drug of choice.
Balmain brought tie dye into the collection in Sprint 2007 as well as a recent 2009 sexy collection by Proenza Schouler.
http://www.buzzle.com/articles/1960s-hippies-fashion.html
http://www.syl.com/articles/thehippiesfashion.html
http://ezinearticles.com/?The-Hippie-Fashion-Statement&id=743650


Punk
By the time the seventies hit, punk was a total reaction to society’s previous sentimentality of 1970’s rock. This mid 70’s trend, started with the followers of the bands the Ramones and the Sex Pistols. Design-wise, it was the brainchild of Vivienne Westwood in London.
The style was in-your-face, rough, tough and abrasive. Much like the original etymology of the word which ment “a young male hustler, a gangster, a hoodlum, or a ruffian.”
Like many of it’s predecessors, punk’s look featured tight pants but also heavy makeup, body piercings, Chuck Taylor shoes and at times, multicolored Mohawk hairstyles. Galliano brought out a punk collection in 2000. Vivienne Westwood always has a punk element in her collections… even when she isn’t even trying. Junya Watanabe got the vibe down in Spring 2006.
http://punkskamusic.suite101.com/article.cfm/punk_fashion
http://www.eightyeightynine.com/culture/80s-punk-hair.html
http://www.fastnbulbous.com/punk.htm


Disco
Thank god we have arrived at something I can relate to… dancing on a box til dawn. Disco was all about just that… dancing. It was sexy nightclub gear almost painted on tight. Can clothing get any tighter? Spandex was in full reign in this decade of non-stop dancing, and of course, cocaine (the drug which kept you dancing until all hours of the morning.) Fabrics were shiny, often times metallic. Quianna knit was a fiber that Dupont had developed and it was everywhere. Body hugging but with drape, this clothing allowed movement but showed the body to it’s best advantage…. Ok, this design trend I miss. Unfortunately, Rafael Lopez in Spring 2002 did a really hack job at trying to bring it back. It was as pretty as a bad acid flashback.
http://www.fashion-era.com/1970s.htm
http://coutureallure.blogspot.com/2009/09/disco-fever-fashion-1978.html
http://www.life123.com/beauty/fashion/disco/disco-fashion.shtml


Hiphop
As distinctive as the music, hip hop style has an African American origin. It was an urban dress that started with a mix of track suits, heavy jewelry, leather jackets and Puma or Adidas running shoes. Over time, this has morphed into throwback jerseys and baggy pants and jewelry. There is lots of bling, layers and layers of bling in this fashion movement. This movement has also been very long lasting. It has also spawned many, many fashion designer who were rappers and music celebrities like Baby Phat and, Queen Latifah. This style movement really is celebrity and musician-based and developed. Other designers have tried really hard to catch this bandwagon.
Everyone from Louis Vuitton, Prada, True Religion, Rock & Republic, Tommy Hilfiger and Ralph Lauren have worked really hard to cash in on this phenomena. Thus it has become a very lucrative target market and design style for many design companies. Many hip hop artists have since come out against all the commercialism that is so prevalent in this genre of dress. To that point, this is a design trend that seems to be fading as the rappers age and become more lucrative in their own right. The most recent collection that was rapper/hiphop inspired seems to be Chirstian Dior in 2000.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hip_hop_fashion
http://www.kingice.com/hip-hop-fashion.aspx
http://24hourhiphop.com/features/Fashion/


The next trend?
Skinny jeans and skin tight clothing…. What a surprise. Less jewelry – I think the recession and a backlash against the bling of Hiphop I think will be the cure. On a more serious note, I think this will take more research to find a real clear trend. Trends in clothing, particularly street trends, grow from the ground on up and are not dictated by someone in Paris on a runway. Today's youth seem to be quiet. Like preceeding generations, they have found their own drug of choice it seems in CristalMeth as it is readily available and cheap to make. This may change with the legalization of pot in California. The last time I heard, pot was the number one perscription drug in the state now.
I would think the younger trend setter would be feeling a bit more disenfranchised similar to the folks of the early 70's. I think there is some anger their with regards to the state of the economy and lack of jobs. The 70's was a huge time of inflation and a time of war...hmmmm. Sounds familiar. I am seeing some more tie dye garb. But I haven't seen any evidence of a new design trend. Music is more downloaded than bought in a store. Monitoring music trends could be a source to point to but with the pluralism that is now in the music market, everyone has a chance to 15 seconds of fame. There are no clear trend setters... except Lady Gaga whom I see as a flash in the pan.
With that, the music of Evanescence, with it's gothic overtone, that seems more of the direction and style I see coming down the road. This would explain the huge growth in her business in the past few years. But that could also be the result of the museum exhibition that has been traveling the world and the subsequent book. Even so, those two events also point me into the direction of a more punk oriented urban trend coming down the pike.
I will keep you abreast of any new trends I see.

Sunday, December 6, 2009

Sexual enhancement in fashion.

I’m sure I’m going to put my foot in it here. So be it.
Sexual enhancement in fashion. Ok — that lead me to say one word — “PURPOSE”. What is the purpose to have sexual enhancement in a garment? Why is the person wearing the garment in the first place? It is NOT to look “nice”, “pretty” or that other heinous word “cute”. Kittens and puppies are “cute”. When one is on the prowl, it not with the intension of looking “cute”.
A wearer of sexually enticing clothing is wanting to look desirable, HOT, enticing and to a certain extent, entertaining.
The wearer does not want to look…. “boring“, “dull”… and heaven forbid, mechanical, or processed, over done… ahem, and dare I say …. Cheap, used, or uninspiring.
With that in mind, I ask“Who is designing great sexy stuff?”
And I really run up a little dry. Let me tell you why. Perhaps it is age… I’m not exactly twenty so the same design themes that make a person look hot at twenty don’t work when you are closer to… oh, god… eeeeek… I can’t to say it… 50… gulp.
In the past, fashion has had some wonderful designers. Versace was amazing for men’s and women’s wear. He knew how to be provocative. Picking up one of his books like Men Without Ties and Do Not Disturb was like buying pornography at the time. It was very, very overt and sexual. His clothing begged comment. Some would say his men’s wear was too gaudy or too colorful. But it was FUN to wear and very sexy. Yes, you had to have a body to pull of a shirt that had 30 different color put into it.
(Just to give you a reference, a typical newspaper/magazine today is printed with 4 colors. A garment or textile may be printed with 8 to 10 a. But 30?) The shirts were museum quality because of the technical difficult to make them. It is the equivalent of wearing a Hermes silk scarf next to your skin. You FEEL desirable. Fur has that same tactile quality next to skin.
But quality aside, there was a tougue and cheek quality to his clothing. It was sexy but also kind of humorous. He took what can be a very intimidating process of wearing something sexually enticing and made it light. It was not fetish wear. Unlike the latex/ leather wear of of batman and catwoman (which tends to be more costume) his clothing was very decadently over-the-top luxury.
Please take note also, for some sexually enhancing clothing IS costume. The gay culture took this to a new level with the Village People each identifying with sexual icon. Gianni Versace however took sexually enticing clothing to a new level. Wearing Versace was like having a good glass of gin before going out, it took the edge off things and made the wearer at ease. Think Agnes in the film Auntie Mame. Drink this and you will feel fine.” Wear Versace and you will be great! Sexually enticing clothing should put the wearer at ease not feel over exposed and nakedly vulnerable in public.
So what is “sexy”?
Think of it in this perspective. What is “sexy”? I once worked at a design house and took a poll of everyone in the office. Thank god I didn’t work at a company like IBM. I would have been fired in a NY minute. The most profound response I got was from my boss of all people. Sexy is a feeling. It comes from within. What a person wears is immaterial as it is what gets that person to unwind and discover that sexuality that lies within and makes a person glow, be confident and open up to anther person. Unfortunately for some, that may be drugs as this is a very intimidating process to dress with the intention of getting somewhere. In a word, it can be torn up jeans and a t-shirt (ok… ick on that one for me).
It can also be a sweatshirt (Jennifer Beals in Flashdance) or a Brioni Black Tie like in a James Bond film.
For some, it is more fetish-esque. Some people equate showing more skin as sexy.
I personally think a costume like what Cher wore to the Oscars is without a doubt sexy, but is also the attitude that she brought to the table with it. She came across with an attitude that said “oh…. Am I over dressed for this party?” Which of course makes the viewer burst out laughing. It is disarmingly funny and at the same time draws the viewer in and invites a conversation. What clothing does that now? What clothing designer can make clothing that is both sexually-enticing and funny at the same time? Damn… hell if I know.
And for men too, the problem comes in with many men not wanting to deem as working too hard for it. I ask you…“How many times have you seen a beautifully desirable woman with an arm charm hack with a five day scruff with shirt tails hanging out & jeans at her side? Men have to have confidence to wear sexually enticing clothing of substance. Most American men just don’t possess that je ne sais quoi to pull it off. Most do not want to be viewed or labeled as “gay”. So they don’t try. What rubbish.
Jean Paul Gaultier did some beautifully provocative work for Madonna’s Blond Ambition Tour. Again, perhaps a bit like costume, but then again,…ya have to start the conversation some where… right?
I think perhaps society is bored with sex. It is so easily available at the drop of a hat in many flavors, shapes and sizes. Log on to the internet, and it is everywhere. Like the song goes from the musical Q, “the internet is for porn”. It is in most films and television. I tossed my TV years ago. It is very easy to find fetish wear clothing. And yeah, for some, torn-up jean and a tight t-shirt work. But what if one wants to take it up a notch? Good luck. Calvin Klein and Abercrobie make great underwear and give the promise of sex in their ads. But do they deliver in the clothing? No.
I think Rick Owens is the next great white hope. His work is very sexy and now. He plays with transparency and lengths/proportion that really evoke a freshness. He brings much to the table. Personally, I see his clothing and I think he designs with himself in mind. That’s not bad thing. There are worse roll-models and the man is Hot (with a capital H).
But he is not universal. Then again, neither is Versace and Jean Paul Gaultier. I wish I could find a really good men’s wear designer that would take sexually enhancing garments to that next level. I have yet to find a designer. Versace is dead. Or sexuality is dead? Beaten like a dead horse. Can someone enlighten me? Or am I jaded? OK… don’t answer that.

Valerie Mendes, Amy De La Haye. 20th Century Fashion. Thames & Hudson London/New York 2005
Gianni Versace Do not Disturb. Abbeville Press, NY 1996
Gianni Versace Men Without Ties. Abbeville Press, NY 1994
-->
Richard Martin Gianni Versace. Metropolitan Museum of Art, NY 1998
Sue Jenkyn Jones Fashion Design, 2nd Ed. Watson-Guptill Publications, NY 2005