Showing posts with label Versace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Versace. Show all posts

Thursday, February 5, 2015

In Celebration of Couture

In celebration of the couture fashion weeks, here are TWO wonderful videos that transports one through the couture experience. Dior is really synonymous with Couture since it's inception. From the moment it opened it's doors in 1946, Christian Dior (now simply Dior) has amazed the world with their craft and attention to detail. Couture, or really Haute Couture translates from French for "high sewing". The "haute" translates as "high". It is the creation of exclusively custom-fitted clothing. It is hand made from start to finish. It is not mass produced but more like the female equivalent of men's bespoke. It is of the finest quality and done with attention to detail. It is only done by the most experienced of craftsmen and craftswomen. It is very TIME CONSUMING and very, very expensive. A couture dress can be as cost as much as a house. It is like purchasing a Monet. The clientele that buy it are in the upper stratosphere of economic privilege. The haute couture garment is made taking into account the wearers measurements, body stance and figure flaws. The designs may be deceptively simple to look at but often very painstakingly produced. Budget is not of consideration in couture. Artistic impact is of the utmost importance. Many garments utilize precious jewels, including diamonds, in the embroidery for maximum impact and reflectivity.

 

The Haute in the Haute

From a legal standpoint, the words Haute Couture are defined by the Chambre de commerce et d'industrie de Paris. This regulatory body determines which houses can be declared "haute couture". To be legally "haute", a designer must meet a few simple criteria. 
  • Each design must be made-to-order for a private client and require more than one fitting.
  • The workroom must have a staff of 15 employees working full time in Paris
  • The workroom must also employ 20 technical staff working in at least one workroom
  • The designer must produce 50 original designs for the public in a collection twice a year.

Few fashion houses have the mean to be considered "haute", however to be considered couture is another story. Couture gets slung around a lot and is often mistake for a luxury ready-to-wear. The two are very different. A high end, ready-to-wear (or pret-a-porter) is often misinterpreted as haute couture and many will align the term with couture. The two are not the same. Most, but not all, couture houses have a ready-to-wear collection that is available to the affluent public. However, that trend is really changing particularly in the last year. Economists take note. Two houses, most recently  Viktor and Rolf and Jean Paul Gaultier have dropped their lucrative ready-to-wear lines and to concentrate on couture. Other fashion houses like Versace have added couture lines to their ready to wear. Thus, there are uber rich shopping as the economic divide has widened. 

The two videos posted are from Dior. The garments are from two distinctly different creators. The first is under the creative vision of the current director Raf Simons. When one looks at it, it appear as a simple top with a striped poof skirt. Don't be deceived. Watch this creation being made and you will see, it is not so simple. 

The second video from Dior is under the creative leadership of John Galliano. A master is creative vision, he has re-entered the design world after a long absence. I can't express how much he was truly missed in his absence. The fashion world was a bit dull and bleak without something to look forward to each season. His new collection for Maison Martin Margiela Margiela was outstanding and showed off his creative talents.







Sunday, December 6, 2009

Sexual enhancement in fashion.

I’m sure I’m going to put my foot in it here. So be it.
Sexual enhancement in fashion. Ok — that lead me to say one word — “PURPOSE”. What is the purpose to have sexual enhancement in a garment? Why is the person wearing the garment in the first place? It is NOT to look “nice”, “pretty” or that other heinous word “cute”. Kittens and puppies are “cute”. When one is on the prowl, it not with the intension of looking “cute”.
A wearer of sexually enticing clothing is wanting to look desirable, HOT, enticing and to a certain extent, entertaining.
The wearer does not want to look…. “boring“, “dull”… and heaven forbid, mechanical, or processed, over done… ahem, and dare I say …. Cheap, used, or uninspiring.
With that in mind, I ask“Who is designing great sexy stuff?”
And I really run up a little dry. Let me tell you why. Perhaps it is age… I’m not exactly twenty so the same design themes that make a person look hot at twenty don’t work when you are closer to… oh, god… eeeeek… I can’t to say it… 50… gulp.
In the past, fashion has had some wonderful designers. Versace was amazing for men’s and women’s wear. He knew how to be provocative. Picking up one of his books like Men Without Ties and Do Not Disturb was like buying pornography at the time. It was very, very overt and sexual. His clothing begged comment. Some would say his men’s wear was too gaudy or too colorful. But it was FUN to wear and very sexy. Yes, you had to have a body to pull of a shirt that had 30 different color put into it.
(Just to give you a reference, a typical newspaper/magazine today is printed with 4 colors. A garment or textile may be printed with 8 to 10 a. But 30?) The shirts were museum quality because of the technical difficult to make them. It is the equivalent of wearing a Hermes silk scarf next to your skin. You FEEL desirable. Fur has that same tactile quality next to skin.
But quality aside, there was a tougue and cheek quality to his clothing. It was sexy but also kind of humorous. He took what can be a very intimidating process of wearing something sexually enticing and made it light. It was not fetish wear. Unlike the latex/ leather wear of of batman and catwoman (which tends to be more costume) his clothing was very decadently over-the-top luxury.
Please take note also, for some sexually enhancing clothing IS costume. The gay culture took this to a new level with the Village People each identifying with sexual icon. Gianni Versace however took sexually enticing clothing to a new level. Wearing Versace was like having a good glass of gin before going out, it took the edge off things and made the wearer at ease. Think Agnes in the film Auntie Mame. Drink this and you will feel fine.” Wear Versace and you will be great! Sexually enticing clothing should put the wearer at ease not feel over exposed and nakedly vulnerable in public.
So what is “sexy”?
Think of it in this perspective. What is “sexy”? I once worked at a design house and took a poll of everyone in the office. Thank god I didn’t work at a company like IBM. I would have been fired in a NY minute. The most profound response I got was from my boss of all people. Sexy is a feeling. It comes from within. What a person wears is immaterial as it is what gets that person to unwind and discover that sexuality that lies within and makes a person glow, be confident and open up to anther person. Unfortunately for some, that may be drugs as this is a very intimidating process to dress with the intention of getting somewhere. In a word, it can be torn up jeans and a t-shirt (ok… ick on that one for me).
It can also be a sweatshirt (Jennifer Beals in Flashdance) or a Brioni Black Tie like in a James Bond film.
For some, it is more fetish-esque. Some people equate showing more skin as sexy.
I personally think a costume like what Cher wore to the Oscars is without a doubt sexy, but is also the attitude that she brought to the table with it. She came across with an attitude that said “oh…. Am I over dressed for this party?” Which of course makes the viewer burst out laughing. It is disarmingly funny and at the same time draws the viewer in and invites a conversation. What clothing does that now? What clothing designer can make clothing that is both sexually-enticing and funny at the same time? Damn… hell if I know.
And for men too, the problem comes in with many men not wanting to deem as working too hard for it. I ask you…“How many times have you seen a beautifully desirable woman with an arm charm hack with a five day scruff with shirt tails hanging out & jeans at her side? Men have to have confidence to wear sexually enticing clothing of substance. Most American men just don’t possess that je ne sais quoi to pull it off. Most do not want to be viewed or labeled as “gay”. So they don’t try. What rubbish.
Jean Paul Gaultier did some beautifully provocative work for Madonna’s Blond Ambition Tour. Again, perhaps a bit like costume, but then again,…ya have to start the conversation some where… right?
I think perhaps society is bored with sex. It is so easily available at the drop of a hat in many flavors, shapes and sizes. Log on to the internet, and it is everywhere. Like the song goes from the musical Q, “the internet is for porn”. It is in most films and television. I tossed my TV years ago. It is very easy to find fetish wear clothing. And yeah, for some, torn-up jean and a tight t-shirt work. But what if one wants to take it up a notch? Good luck. Calvin Klein and Abercrobie make great underwear and give the promise of sex in their ads. But do they deliver in the clothing? No.
I think Rick Owens is the next great white hope. His work is very sexy and now. He plays with transparency and lengths/proportion that really evoke a freshness. He brings much to the table. Personally, I see his clothing and I think he designs with himself in mind. That’s not bad thing. There are worse roll-models and the man is Hot (with a capital H).
But he is not universal. Then again, neither is Versace and Jean Paul Gaultier. I wish I could find a really good men’s wear designer that would take sexually enhancing garments to that next level. I have yet to find a designer. Versace is dead. Or sexuality is dead? Beaten like a dead horse. Can someone enlighten me? Or am I jaded? OK… don’t answer that.

Valerie Mendes, Amy De La Haye. 20th Century Fashion. Thames & Hudson London/New York 2005
Gianni Versace Do not Disturb. Abbeville Press, NY 1996
Gianni Versace Men Without Ties. Abbeville Press, NY 1994
-->
Richard Martin Gianni Versace. Metropolitan Museum of Art, NY 1998
Sue Jenkyn Jones Fashion Design, 2nd Ed. Watson-Guptill Publications, NY 2005

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Tie one on!

I dedicate this column to my good friend Dr. Russ Rogers. While shopping at Macy’s, the sales clerk behind the tie counter quite bluntly told him he had old-fashioned taste in ties and to step it up a notch. She was 90.
The necktie. It’s a source of unfounded hatred in most men. One could say its origins go back to 210 BC in China. But this early precursor does not look anything like the hangman’s noose of today. The early versions look more/less like a neck scarf that we could wear in winter or what we could think of as a cravat. Chinese emperor Shih Huang Ti was buried with an 7,500 life-size terracotta replicas of his famed fighting force ment to guide him to the afterlife. Each of the 7,500 figure are different except in one respect: all wear neck cloths. It is thought that this necktie was symbol or gift to the soldiers from the leader for bravery.
In 113 A.D., Roman Emperor Trajan erected a marble column to commemorate a triumphant victory over the Dacians. This tower-like column contains 2,500 realistic figures with three different styles of neckwear. Again, the necktie seemed to have been a symbol for bravery and symbolizes the warrior. While Roman soldiers did not cover their necks (Horace and Seneca wrote only effeminate men covered their necks), legionnaires or truly great fighters that were skilled in battle and therefore immune to perceptions of appearing feminine… or in our world “gay”.
Louis XIV of France liked the colorful silk kerchiefs worn around the necks of Croatian mercenaries. The King thanked the fighters in 1660 for assisting in a victory against the Hapsburg Empire. Some experts believe the French word for tie, cravat, is a corruption of “Croat.” Other suggest cravat is derived from the Turkish word kyrabacs, or the Hungarian, korbacs, both meaning “whip” or “long, slender object.” Regardless, the elegant French courtiers, and the military immediately began copying the Croatians.
Also in 1660, King Charles II returned to England and reclaimed the throne that had been lost during the Puritan revolution and "Old Ironsides" Oliver Cromwell. The exiled aristocrats returned to England and with them brought a passion for the European court trappings. The stylish cravat was popular for those who could afford it. King Charles II is said to have once spent 20 pounds and 12 shillings on a single cravat. This was as much as five times an annual middle class salary. Bet he didn't spill gravy on that one.
Art museums throughout the U.S. and Europe are full of paintings from the 17th and 18th centuries showing generals, politicians, and aristocrats resplendent in their lace, ribbon, and embroidered cravats. Around 1800, prizefighter Jem Belcher took to a colorful bandanna or neck scarf. Working class Englishmen by thousands were wearing colored bandannas as lace was expensive and the colorful scarf was seen as a more practical approach to fashion.
Derived from the Sanskrit word, bandhna, or bandhana, meaning "tying", bandannas were first imported from India around 1700. The original bandannas were silk and came in an array of colors. Howdy Doody lost something in the translation,
Someone I have written of before, George Bryan "Beau" Brummell before. He advocated well-cut, tailored clothes that were void of frills. Brummell rejected lace and preferred somber black suiting with a crisp white cravats. Anal to a fault, Brummell would change his cravat as often as three times a day so they were perfect. The simplicity of Brummell's uniform was adopted by nearly everyone from the working class to the upper echelons of royalty.
Designed by Teenagers… eeeeeeewww.
The I Zingari Cricket Club, founded by a group of Cambridge University students in 1845 is believed to have created the first sporting colors. In 1880, the rowing club at Oxford University's Exeter College One men's club, invented the first school tie. It was essentially a hat band from a bowler. Later in the semester, when guys ordered their hats, they ordered an extra band to use as a necktie. As they matured into gentlemen, such ties had enormous appeal to the vast Victorian middle class. In the industrialized society, men wanted to stand out, assert social superiority, or proclaim allegiance to a group. The necktie became a symbol of associations.
A COUPLE OF SIDE NOTES
The bow tie gets is name from the French, jabot, (pronounced ja-bow), a type of 17th century lace cravat. In the 18th and 19th centuries, bow ties came in various materials and styles. White bow ties were considered formal, but casual wear was multicolored. The black bow tie (or black tie as we know it today) dates to 1886, when Pierre Lorillard V (or his son, Griswald Lorillard known for creating a stir by wearing unorthodox and outrageous clothing) invented the tuxedo as an alternative to the tailcoats worn with white bow ties. History is a bit fuzzy here. Somehow or in someway, one of the two gentlemen showed up to the1886 Tuxedo Club's Autumn Ball and made a stir. Pierre Lorillard V was the man who brought yacht racing to New Port, RI and was highly respected in Victorian Society. He was the man who sold the Breakers property to Cornelius Vanderbilt II. My money is on the kid.
When is a tie not a tie?
In 1940s, Victor Cedarstaff went riding outside Wickenburg, Arizona. When the wind blew his hat off, Cedarstaff removed the hatband. The hat band had a silver buckle that he did not want to lose. He put it around his neck. Friends liked his new tie. Cedarstaff returned home and later patented the new neckwear, which was called the bolo because it resembled the lengths of rope used by Argentine gauchos to catch cattle. In 1971, the Arizona legislature named the bolo the official state neckwear… there is just no accounting for taste. Sorry folks, it is just too ugly to post on my blog.
In the American south to wear lace or silk cravats was just too messy and hot. However in the early 1800s, plantation owners displayed their social superiority by wearing wide ribbons tied in bows. These became know as Plantation Ties. River gamblers, Mark Twain and Colonel Sanders adopted this look… anything to sell a bucket of chicken.
Finally Paris fashion designer Jean Patou invented the designer tie in 1920. A smart marketer, Patou targeted the women purchasers. Today women buy 80 percent of ties sold in the US. That is why ties are often displayed near the perfume or women’s cosmetics. Statistics show that the tie is an impulse purchase.
In 1924, American tailor named Jesse Langsdorf created--and patented--the tie's modern look, with its bias cut and three-piece construction. Regular four-in-hand ties run the gamut in length from 55” to 58”. Big and tall ties are longer.
Prior to designing clothing, Ralph Lauren was a tie salesman. He launched the heinously ugly 4-in.-wide (10 cm) trend in the 1970s.
The tie of today
A quality tie has a good outer shell fabric of silk and proper interlinings. Finer ties are lined with 100% wool. Most other quality ties use a wool mixture. The finer ties have a higher percent of wool content in the lining and a 100% silk outer. Cheaper ties are polyester or a poly silk. Finer ties are also hand made, not unlike a bespoke suit. The highest quality ties are those that are called “seven-fold” ties. These is made from a square yard of silk folded seven times, and do not require any lining.
The proper width of a tie, and one that will never be out of style, is 3 1/4 inches (2 3/4 to 3 1/2 inches are also acceptable). As long as the proportions of men's clothing remain true to a man's body shape, this width will set the proper balance. Thus fat men can wear wide ties, however it is not ment to be a bib. Standard neckties come in lengths anywhere from 52 to 58 inches long. Taller men, or those who use a Windsor knot, may require a longer tie. After being tied, the tips of the necktie should be long enough to reach the waistband of the trousers. FYI, a necktie is really easy to make. I encourage people to try sewing one as it is a great first sewing project.
Auf Wiedersehen to the necktie?
The turtleneck could be called the anti-tie. British writer Noel Coward started wearing colored turtlenecks in the 1920's and created a new fad. French intellectuals and their counterparts in the United States popularized black turtlenecks in the 1950s.
Later in the 1970’s, Photographer Victor Screbneski popularized this again by photographing celebrities in black turtlenecks.
U.S. market share for American-made ties has fallen to about 40% today, from a high of 75% in 1995. U.S. sales of ties have plummeted to $677.7 million in the 12 months ending March 31, from their peak of $1.3 billion in 1995. This trend of the dying necktie was evident when some members of the Men’s Dress Furnishings Association attended the group’s annual luncheon in New York. A number of people turned up sans tie.
OK..... A Major Peeve.
I really don’t mind wearing a tie. When society pressures force me to wear one like working at conservative office environment or black tie function, I usually go out on a limb and wear something truly outrageous. I have a transparent sequin encrusted tank top that I sport with my tux. My philosophy is simple: more is more and subtle is boring. But in a general sense, a tie can make a guy look pretty cleaned up, presentable and, in some cases, even smart. Most experts agree that one should not send a necktie out to be dry-cleaned, they will completely #$%^&* it up. While dry cleaners may be able to remove spots, once they press the tie, the idiots compress the lining and dull the luster of the silk. I hate it when drycleaners press a tie. I have two suggestion should you take your tie to the cleaners. First off, tell them “You press it, you bought it.” When that fails, take the lead of dancer Fred Astaire and use it as a very expensive belt.
A special thanks to:
David Johnson, 2,000 years of the necktie
(he knows everything there is to know about neckties) check out his writings at:
Neckwear Association of America
Sarah Giddings , The Tie, Columbia Encyclopedia, fifth edition; Time Almanac, 1999
The Last Resorts, by Cleveland Amory
http://www.neckties.com/
FINALLY - Yes a tie can look sexy as seen in the images below.